Ready to Implement Now…Reading Strategies for all Subjects

The weight of the past two years feels heavy on our shoulders. Teachers are reporting that students are lacking skills in social-emotional areas and academic skills. Many teachers are asking, “How do we support our students and the gaps in learning we are seeing with them right now?”

Taking a “we are all in this together” approach, it seems imperative that we, as a school community of educators, tackle what we’re seeing in our students head on, and collaboratively.

In the 2019 book Disciplinary Literacy Inquiry & Instruction by Jacy Ippolito, Christina L. Dobbs, and Megin Charner-Laird, the case for teaching literacy across disciplines is strongly made. All teachers should view themselves as playing significant roles in developing a student’s literacy.

One way teachers can support students is by pointing out ways in which texts look very different in each class.  The text that students engage with in Language Arts looks very different from text in a Career and Technical Education course.  The lens that a reader must take for a Social Studies text, which is filled with bias, is different from many texts in a Science course.  

AdLit: All About Student Literacy has a website has a slew of amazing, simple, & ready-to-implement-today reading strategies that all teachers can use in their next lessons. The strategies emphasized are: Comprehension, Vocabulary, and Writing. What I like most about the way the website organizes these are in when you would implement these strategies in the reading process: BEFORE reading, DURING reading, and AFTER reading. I want to highlight a favorite from each stage of the reading process. If you’re intrigued, the website is easy to navigate and will offer many more!

Before Reading – Concept Sorts

One of my favorite reading strategies is Concept Sorts — using this technique, you can develop some prior knowledge and connections you want kids to make on their own. As an added bonus, the format is simple and will reach all students.

(Concept Sorting is a way of engaging students in Hexagonal Thinking, which has become a new rage in education – If you’d like to learn more about it, I’ll link an interesting blog post from The Cult of Pedagogy.)

During Reading – Concept Maps & Highlighting

The first one you might want to consider trying while students are reading is a Concept Map (I like to call them Brain Webs) — it’s low-stake writing and thinking, perfect for students with skills that are limited. The limited amount of writing and focus on single words and phrases helps students organize their thoughts quickly.

Another strategy I love and slightly adapted from the website version is Two Highlighters: Important and Confusing – I love telling my students, “It’s a sign of intelligence to be able to admit what you don’t know or understand.” The idea is in one color, they highlight words and moments that they don’t understand. The other color is for those moments that make us think, “Wow, this seems really important. I may not know why exactly yet, but I want to remember to look back at this later.” When I model this in front of them, chart it on a simple table in my reader’s notebook, and show them how to resolve simple issues that may be tripping them up, it increases reading comprehension by so much. It forces students to go back and re-read, to think deeply, and shows them a strategy they can use in any class, with any text. Once students have these moments organized, teachers can help strategize ways to resolve the difficult moments. If it’s vocabulary, would defining it help? Finding a synonym to replace the difficult vocabulary term? Is it a context issue?

After Reading – Summarizing

Summarizing is a tough skill for students, but we know it helps build comprehension. Generally, we see students write too much or pull out less-important information. Using this strategy, teachers can hone in prior knowledge and help build vocabulary. One way you could guide students into a more-targeted approach is the  

How to implement this right away: ​​Begin by reading OR have students listen to the text selection. 

  1. Ask students to write a summary of the target text based on the following framework questions:
    • What are the main ideas?
    • What are the crucial details necessary for supporting the ideas?
    • What information is irrelevant or unnecessary?
  2. Guide students throughout the summary writing process. Have them use keywords or phrases to identify the main points from the text.
  3. Encourage students to write successively shorter summaries, constantly refining their written piece until only the most essential and relevant information remains. I like the “Summarizing 5-3-1” method. Give students a task to summarize a passage or text in five sentences. Then practice with three sentences. And finally, challenge students to write a one-sentence summary. They will improve on identifying the most important details quickly with this strategy.

Questions about these strategies? Reach out to [email protected]

(More Lessons Learned from the Equitable Grading Think Tank) Grading is More than Grades #2: Retakes/Redos & Extra Credit

Equitable Grading: The Power of Points

Many teachers use some version of points in their grading system.  Points may be given for assignments and assessments, extra credit, behavior, participation, and/or motivation.  Most of us probably had teachers who used points in the classrooms we grew up in.  

The downside to using points is that they can turn into a commodity that students use to get a grade, rather than an accurate representation of a student’s knowledge.  Students may ask how to earn a few more points to get from an 87% to a 90%, but none would ask for those three points to move from an 84% to 87%. However, as long as the point increase is accompanied by an increase in learning, shouldn’t all increases be considered valuable?

Redos and Retakes

All of us have taught a lesson that did not go the way we’d hoped, only to get to try again the next period or the next day. What if our students stopped us and said, “Sorry, you can’t teach that to us again, you taught it yesterday!”

It is true that the world has timelines, but it also gives grace for learning. The ability to redo something happens all the time in our students’ lives.  (Retaking a driving test is perhaps the most important retake our students will have in their adolescence! When our children don’t do a good enough job cleaning their room we don’t say “You got one chance to clean it!” We say, “Go back and do it until it is done correctly.” They – and us – get redos every day, when the first effort wasn’t successful. 

If the goal of a class is to impart knowledge to a student, then when the student demonstrates that knowledge must be flexible.  The ability for students to try again to show their understanding of the content taught shows we value their learning, more than our timeline. Furthermore, if the students can represent full knowledge of course standards, they should earn 100% of the points available. Removing an artificial celling (i.e., student can only earn 80% of the original total may reward a student for persisting, but it also punishes them for not learning as fast as others. Why do we want to do that?

Retakes and redos as mandatory practices in classrooms provide an equal opportunity to all students to show what they have come to understand as a result of our instruction and purposeful tasks in the classroom.  If a student has a history of low success in school, providing multiple opportunities to be successful breaks a cycle of low achievement.  It tells the student the game is not won at halftime, but at the end – and that adjustments can be made along the way.  We also send the message to the students “I will not let you fail!” We continue to push the students to learn the critical information that we have determined is worthy of their time and effort.

8:33

Extra Credit Points

By definition, extra credit points are not required.  This means that is some extreme cases, the points may not even be related to the standards being taught in the course (extra points for bringing in supplies or cleaning the board.) Extra credit exacerbates school as a game.  If the purpose is for your students to know and understand a set of standards and content, then providing extra credit does not move a student toward more knowledge, it makes a grade currency that some students look to collect.  

Extra credit can also undermine the desired outcomes of student learning.  Students who play the point chasing game can give less effort to important key learning only to “make up” points with less critical knowledge.  If the extra credit points are tied tightly to the learning of the course, then shouldn’t they be available to all students, not just those who have the knowledge of how to navigate the educational system. If the work is important, require it; if it is not, don’t include it in the grade.  

Curious to learn more? Education Week Article: “No. You Can’t Do Extra Credit.” https://www.edweek.org/teaching-learning/opinion-no-you-cant-do-extra-credit/2014/12

More Lessons Learned from the Equitable Grading Think Tank – Grading is More than Grades #1: Homework

While much of the conversation around equitable grading can be about what ends up on a report card, we all know there is a lot that goes into the creation of that final grade.  The Equitable Grading Think Tank is also looking at the processes that guide the formation of that grade. Today’s post is about one area of their exploration: Homework.

There is no doubt that homework is an important part of a student’s school experience.   Homework is the application of the skills and content taught in class.  When homework is assigned, it is best when there is a high probability of success on the work; otherwise, students will be practicing incorrectly and will not have the ability to receive corrective feedback.  We want to know if the student understands the content taught and to give them an opportunity to show that understanding.  What we don’t want to do is have a student make mistakes.  The old saying “Practice makes perfect” is not actually true. “Practice makes permanent” is true.  This is why we want the practice to have a high level of success. 

The practice that will have the most benefit for students is assigning things that a student is revisiting, is called spaced practice (6:23 minutes – works great at 1.5 speed!) This means that a homework assignment could have a few questions from a couple of weeks ago, a few questions from last week, and a couple of questions from the most recent learning that connect to the earlier parts of the homework. 

In some classrooms, the homework assigned is the work of that day, (i.e., “Please finish any of today’s classwork you ran out of time to complete.”) For students with a weaker understanding of the content, the issue is now they must complete the work with fewer academic scaffolds.  Students will do the work without the supports of the classroom, which includes other students who have received the same instruction and the teacher who delivered the instruction.  While some students may have supports at home to produce accurate work, almost none of them will have the supports that were tied to the initial instruction.  The most inequitable part of homework comes between those students who do not have the space, adult support, or ability to dedicate time (due to family and work responsibilities) to do homework and those who have all of these. 

Since homework is practice, having homework play a smaller percentage of the overall grade makes sense. Grades on homework are typically given for 2 reasons: 1) correctness of work and/or 2) reasonable attempts made. If homework is given a heavy weight in an overall grade, we can have an inaccurate understanding of the students’ knowledge because the student for a variety of reasons, including correcting misunderstandings after the grade was assigned.

It is important that homework, if tabulated into a student’s grade, plays an accurate and supportive role – one that is motivating to both students and teacher. Curious to hear more? Rick Wormeli is one of the first Nationally Board Certified teachers in America, working full-time as an author, researcher, and trainer of teachers. Here, he discusses homework and grading policy.

Here’s the good news: If you did nothing more than alter your homework assignments to have more “spaced practice” characteristics, you would have taken a enormous step forward in utilizing a more equitable system that may well work better for you AND your students. It’s a possibility worth considering.